|
MRR-101:Understanding Development-Caused Displacement
The objective of MRR-101, Understanding Development Caused
Displacement, is to provide the historical background and
context of resettlement and rehabilitation projects. This is
done with references to the impacts of development projects
in different parts of India and a few other countries.
a) Block 1: Development and Displacement provides an
overall perspective of displacement and deals with the
thinking behind development. Beginning with International
Scenario in R&R; it leads to the understanding of the impact
of displacement on various categories of affected persons
leads the way to arguing for minimising displacement. It is
evident that the concern here is with planned, often forced,
displacement in the name of national development. Since this
form of displacement is in essence a planned activity, it
should be possible for the project authorities to plan
resettlement as well as rehabilitation. In fact, project
authorities have a duty to resettle displaced people and
ensure their rehabilitation. In reality it is rarely done.
b) Block 2 on Laws related to R&R covers the Land
Acquisition Act of 1894 (LA Act), which is the basic Act
under which land is acquired for any public purpose. The
steps to be taken by the Government to acquire land under
the LA Act, its scope and process, as well as implications
of the Amendment Act of 1984 are detailed. The Block also
describes three other Acts under which land can be acquired
for specific purposes like national highways, coal-bearing
areas and for conducting military exercises. The variation
between these Acts and the Land Acquisition Act are also
listed. The other land acquisition acts discussed in the
Block are the Wild Life (Projection) Act, 1972, the Indian
Forest Act, 1927 and the Indian Forest (Conservation) Act,
1980.
c) Block 3 on Resettlement and Rehabilitation
Policies discusses on the few rehabilitation policies of the
1990s that give some guidelines for resettlement but are not
legally binding. It make a strong case for a national policy
on R&R. |